The Commutator Bound
The commutator
Two observables and do not, in general, commute. Their commutator is the operator
If the operators share a complete set of eigenstates and can in principle be measured simultaneously with arbitrary precision. When , a fundamental constraint kicks in.
Robertson's inequality
In 1929, H. P. Robertson derived a general lower bound on the product of standard deviations of any two observables. For a system in state , let and be the standard deviations of and respectively. Then
where is the expectation value of the commutator in that state.
The inequality follows from the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality applied to the vectors and . One writes and notes that the imaginary part equals (so that , recalling that is purely imaginary for Hermitian ), so the Cauchy–Schwarz bound gives exactly Robertson's result.
Position and momentum
The canonical commutation relation,
is the foundational algebraic fact of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Because equals times the identity, the expectation value in every normalizable state, and Robertson's inequality immediately gives
This is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, now understood as a theorem about operators rather than a statement about experimental disturbance. The numerical bound is
States that saturate the bound — Gaussian wave packets for which — are called minimum-uncertainty states. The harmonic-oscillator coherent states are the canonical example (they keep equal, balanced spreads in and ); the squeezed states are minimum-uncertainty packets too, trading a smaller spread in one variable for a larger spread in the other. All non-Gaussian states have a strictly larger product.
Other pairs
The Robertson inequality applies to any two observables. For the components of angular momentum, , so
Here the bound does depend on the state through . In an eigenstate of with quantum number the right-hand side vanishes, so Robertson's inequality imposes no constraint at all. A vanishing bound does not imply the two observables become sharp, however: for any that same state has . The inequality is simply silent there.
Try it
This is a numerical exercise — return a number, not a circuit.
Using , compute the lower bound on
implied by the Robertson inequality and the canonical commutation relation.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.