Position–Momentum Uncertainty
Why position and momentum cannot both be sharp
Measure a particle's position very precisely and you inevitably disturb its momentum — and vice versa. This is not a limitation of instruments; it is a fundamental feature of any wave-like description. A state with a sharply defined position is a narrow spike in space, which requires a broad spread of spatial frequencies to build, and spatial frequency is proportional to momentum. A state with a sharply defined momentum is a pure plane wave that extends over all space, so its position is completely indefinite.
Heisenberg's Robertson–Schrödinger inequality makes this precise. For position and momentum :
Here is the standard deviation of position in the given state, and is the same for momentum. Neither uncertainty is zero unless the state is not normalizable, and they cannot both be simultaneously small.
The minimum product is achieved by Gaussian (coherent) states — wave packets of the form
which have and . Every other normalizable state has a larger product.
A numerical feel for the bound
In SI units J·s, which is tiny. For a macroscopic ball ( mm) the lower bound on is kg·m/s — undetectably small. At atomic scales ( m, one ångström) the minimum momentum spread is kg·m/s, corresponding to electron speeds of order m/s (comparable to the Bohr velocity m/s) — physically significant and observable in atomic spectra and ionization energies.
Try it
This is a numerical exercise — your code should return a number.
Work in natural units where . A particle has position uncertainty . Compute the minimum allowed momentum uncertainty from the Heisenberg bound.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.