|q⟩ Bad Qubits

intermediate · Physics · Entanglement & the EPR/Bell Inequalities

Tsirelson’s Bound

Quantum mechanics violates the classical CHSH bound S2|S| \le 2, reaching 222\sqrt2 with the right settings. A natural question: could a cleverer state or measurement push SS even higher? Tsirelson's bound answers no — 222\sqrt2 is the absolute quantum ceiling.

The statement

Tsirelson's bound (1980). For any quantum state and any choice of ±1\pm 1-valued local observables, the CHSH value satisfies

S    222.828.|S| \;\le\; 2\sqrt2 \approx 2.828.

Compare the three regimes:

Quantum theory sits strictly between classical and the most extreme no-signalling correlations.

Why 222\sqrt2 — the operator argument

Represent Alice's two measurements by Hermitian operators A,AA, A' and Bob's by B,BB, B', each with eigenvalues ±1\pm 1, so A2=A2=B2=B2=1A^2 = A'^2 = B^2 = B'^2 = \mathbb{1}. Alice's operators commute with Bob's (they act on different particles). The CHSH operator is

S=AB+AB+ABAB.\mathcal{S} = A \otimes B + A \otimes B' + A' \otimes B - A' \otimes B'.

Square it. Using A2=1A^2 = \mathbb{1} etc. and that AA-operators commute with BB-operators, the cross-terms collapse and one finds the remarkable identity

S2=41[A,A][B,B].\mathcal{S}^2 = 4\,\mathbb{1} - [A, A'] \otimes [B, B'].

The operator norm obeys S24+[A,A][B,B]\|\mathcal{S}^2\| \le 4 + \|[A,A']\|\,\|[B,B']\|. For ±1\pm 1 observables each commutator norm is bounded by [A,A]2AA=2\|[A,A']\| \le 2\|A\|\,\|A'\| = 2, so

S24+22=8S8=22.\|\mathcal{S}^2\| \le 4 + 2 \cdot 2 = 8 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \|\mathcal{S}\| \le \sqrt8 = 2\sqrt2.

Since S=SS|S| = |\langle \mathcal{S}\rangle| \le \|\mathcal{S}\|, the CHSH value can never exceed 222\sqrt2.

The bound is tight

The previous lesson exhibited a singlet state and measurement angles achieving exactly 222\sqrt2. So the bound is not merely an upper limit — it is attained. Maximally entangled two-qubit states with 4545^\circ-spaced settings saturate it.

The takeaway

The factor 2\sqrt2 separating classical from quantum is not arbitrary: it is the operator-norm signature of non-commuting ±1\pm 1 observables. The same commutator [A,A][A, A'] that forbids simultaneously sharp values — the very feature EPR found objectionable — is exactly what powers the violation, and exactly what caps it at 222\sqrt2.

Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.