Estimating Ground-State Energy
The previous lesson chose a trial family that happened to contain the exact answer. The variational method earns its keep when the trial family does not contain the true ground state — then it still delivers a rigorous upper bound, and we learn how good (or poor) the guess is.
A deliberately imperfect guess
Take the hydrogen atom, in atomic units (, energies in Hartree):
The true ground state decays exponentially, . Suppose we did not know that and guessed a Gaussian instead,
A Gaussian falls off too fast at large and is too flat at the origin (it has zero slope there, whereas the real wavefunction has a cusp). It is the wrong shape — exactly the situation where the variational principle proves its worth.
The variational energy
Carrying out the (standard Gaussian) integrals for the kinetic and Coulomb terms and normalizing gives
The first term is the kinetic cost of confinement; the second is the (negative) Coulomb attraction. Minimizing,
Substituting back,
Reading the result
Two facts make this a textbook illustration of the method:
- The bound holds. , so the estimate sits above the exact ground-state energy, exactly as the variational principle demands. A Gaussian can never report an energy below the truth.
- The error is modest but visible. The estimate is about too high. A wrong-shape trial state captures the gross balance of kinetic and potential energy but misses the cusp and the slow tail, so it cannot reach the exact value.
Try it
Minimize over and return the
minimum energy (a negative Hartree number). Confirm for yourself that it stays above .
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.