intermediate · Physics · Time-Independent Perturbation Theory
First-Order State Corrections
How the state shifts
In the previous lesson we projected the first-order equation onto ⟨n(0)∣ to extract the
energy. To find the state correction ∣n(1)⟩ we project onto a different unperturbed
state ⟨m(0)∣ with m=n. Starting from
H^(0)∣n(1)⟩+H^′∣n(0)⟩=En(0)∣n(1)⟩+En(1)∣n(0)⟩,
and using ⟨m(0)∣H^(0)=Em(0)⟨m(0)∣ together with
⟨m(0)∣n(0)⟩=0, the En(1) term drops out and we get
(Em(0)−En(0))⟨m(0)∣n(1)⟩+⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩=0.
Solving for the overlap of ∣n(1)⟩ with each ∣m(0)⟩ gives the coefficients. We
choose the normalization ⟨n(0)∣n(1)⟩=0 (the correction has no component along the
original state — that would only rescale it). Expanding ∣n(1)⟩ in the unperturbed basis:
Each unperturbed state ∣m(0)⟩ mixes into ∣n⟩ by an amount set by two factors:
the coupling⟨m(0)∣H^′∣n(0)⟩ — how strongly the perturbation connects
the two states, and
the inverse energy gap1/(En(0)−Em(0)) — nearby levels mix much more than distant ones.
This is why a vanishing gap (degeneracy) is dangerous: the coefficient diverges, and ordinary
perturbation theory fails. It also explains the convergence condition from the first lesson — the ratio
of coupling to gap must be small for the correction to be a genuine small admixture.
A two-level example
Take H^(0)=diag(E0(0),E1(0)) with E0(0)=1, E1(0)=4, and a
perturbation with off-diagonal coupling ⟨1(0)∣H^′∣0(0)⟩=0.6. The only state
that can mix into ∣0⟩ is ∣1⟩, with coefficient
so ∣0(1)⟩=−0.2∣1⟩ and the corrected state is approximately
∣0⟩−0.2∣1⟩ (before renormalization).
Try it
Using the example above (E0(0)=1, E1(0)=4, coupling
⟨1(0)∣H^′∣0(0)⟩=0.6), compute the mixing coefficient c1 of ∣1⟩ in
the first-order correction to the ground state, and return it as a number.
Run your code to see the quantum state.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.