For two fermions we wrote an antisymmetric combination by hand. For three, four, or N fermions,
antisymmetrizing every ordering by hand becomes unwieldy. The Slater determinant packages the
whole construction into a single elegant formula.
The determinant idea
Suppose N fermions occupy N distinct single-particle orbitals ϕ1,ϕ2,…,ϕN.
Arrange a matrix whose rows are labelled by particles and whose columns are labelled by orbitals,
with entry ϕj(xi) in row i, column j. The antisymmetric N-fermion state is the
determinant of this matrix, normalized by 1/N!:
A determinant has two properties that match fermionic statistics perfectly:
Swapping two rows flips its sign. Exchanging particles i and j swaps two rows, so
Ψ→−Ψ. The state is automatically antisymmetric.
A determinant with two equal columns is zero. If two fermions occupied the same orbital,
ϕi=ϕj, two columns would be identical and the determinant would vanish. This is the
Pauli exclusion principle, built in for free.
So the Slater determinant enforces both antisymmetry and exclusion without any extra bookkeeping.
This is exactly the antisymmetric combination from the previous lessons, now read off a 2×2
determinant. The exercise has you evaluate one such determinant numerically.
Limits of a single determinant
A single Slater determinant captures the statistics of identical fermions exactly, but it does not
capture all of their correlation. Real electrons repel each other, and the true ground state is
generally a superposition of many determinants. Nonetheless, the single-determinant picture is the
indispensable starting point: it guarantees the wavefunction is properly antisymmetric before any
correlation corrections are added.
Try it
Evaluate the two-particle Slater determinant 21(ϕa(x1)ϕb(x2)−ϕb(x1)ϕa(x2)) for the orbital values given in the starter code, and return its numeric
value.
Run your code to see the quantum state.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.