Finite Potential Step
Classical physics says that a particle with enough energy clears a step and a particle without it bounces back. Quantum mechanics says something richer: even when the particle has more energy than the step, there is a non-zero probability of reflection. Setting up the problem carefully is the first step toward understanding this, and toward the far stranger phenomenon of tunneling through a barrier.
The potential
Place a step potential along the -axis:
where is the height of the step. A particle of mass and total energy travels from left to right. We focus on the over-barrier case first.
The stationary-state approach
Because the potential is piecewise constant, the time-independent Schrödinger equation
reduces to a simple second-order ODE with constant coefficients in each region. Define two wave-numbers:
Both and are real and positive when . In region I the general solution is a superposition of a right-moving incident wave and a left-moving reflected wave:
In region II, which extends to , there is no surface to reflect from, so only a transmitted wave propagates to the right:
The amplitudes , , and are complex numbers. By convention is treated as known (the incoming beam is prepared with amplitude ), and we solve for and .
Matching conditions at the boundary
The wave function and its first derivative must both be continuous everywhere, including at the step at . Continuity of :
Continuity of :
These two equations in two unknowns ( and ) are the entire algebra of the problem. Solving them gives
Why reflection occurs at all
Classically, a particle with always passes the step; reflection is impossible. Quantum mechanically, whenever , i.e., whenever . The physical reason is that the wave-number changes abruptly at : the wave is propagating at wavelength on the left and on the right. Whenever two media with different propagation speeds meet at a sharp boundary, partial reflection is inevitable — this is the same physics that partially reflects light at a glass surface, expressed in wave mechanics.
Sub-barrier case and the approach to tunneling
When the quantity is negative, so would be imaginary. Write (real, positive). The solution in region II becomes an evanescent (exponentially decaying) wave:
The matching conditions still hold, and the algebra shows : the step reflects the particle with probability 1, matching the classical prediction. However, is not zero — the wave function penetrates into the classically forbidden region with a characteristic length .
This penetration depth is the seed of tunneling: if region II has finite width rather than extending to infinity, the wave function can reach the far side before decaying to zero, and transmission becomes possible. That scenario — the rectangular barrier — is the subject of the next lesson.
Summary of the setup
The finite potential step is solved in three moves:
- Write down and (or in the sub-barrier case) from the kinetic energy in each region.
- Write the most general wave function in each region consistent with the boundary conditions at infinity (no incoming wave from the right).
- Match and at to find the reflection and transmission amplitudes.
The reflection coefficient and the transmission coefficient will be derived in the next lesson; they satisfy as required by probability conservation.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.