The Klein–Gordon Equation
The Schrödinger equation is built on the non-relativistic energy . It treats time and space asymmetrically (first derivative in , second in ) and breaks Lorentz invariance. To describe fast particles we need a wave equation consistent with special relativity. The first attempt — the Klein–Gordon equation — succeeds for spinless particles and exposes, through its failures, the deep features of relativistic quantum theory.
From the relativistic energy to a wave equation
Special relativity gives the energy–momentum relation (with the speed of light)
Promote energy and momentum to operators, and , and apply both sides to a field :
Rearranged, this is the Klein–Gordon equation:
Manifestly covariant form
Using the d'Alembertian and the Compton wavenumber , it compresses to the Lorentz-invariant statement
Treating and on equal footing — both appearing as second derivatives — is exactly what restores Lorentz invariance. Plane-wave solutions obey the relativistic dispersion relation .
Two problems Schrödinger never had
The Klein–Gordon equation immediately raises two difficulties that shaped all of relativistic quantum theory.
Negative energies. Solving gives both signs,
Unlike the non-relativistic case, the negative-energy branch cannot simply be discarded — it is needed for completeness, and a spectrum unbounded below seems to allow unlimited energy release.
Negative probabilities. The conserved density that comes with the equation,
involves a first time derivative, so it is not positive-definite: with the freedom to choose and independently at one instant, can come out negative. It cannot be a probability density in the Schrödinger sense.
What the Klein–Gordon equation is good for
Despite the interpretational subtleties, the Klein–Gordon equation correctly describes spin-0 particles — the pions and the Higgs boson are physical Klein–Gordon fields. It also reproduces relativistic kinematics and, in the non-relativistic limit with , reduces to the ordinary Schrödinger equation: writing and dropping against recovers exactly. It is the correct theory — for particles without spin. Dirac's question was how to do the same for the electron, which has spin , and the answer is the subject of the next lesson.
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.