The Scattering Amplitude
Last lesson ended on the claim . Here we define the scattering amplitude precisely, show where that identity comes from, and meet the constraint — the optical theorem — that flux conservation imposes on it.
The scattering boundary condition
We solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation at energy ,
subject to the physically motivated boundary condition that, far from the target, the wavefunction is an incident plane wave plus an outgoing scattered spherical wave:
The coefficient of the outgoing wave is the scattering amplitude. It has dimensions of length, carries all the angular information, and is exactly what experiment measures.
From amplitude to cross-section
Compute the radial probability current of the scattered piece . Using and keeping the leading term,
The number of particles per second through a detector of area is . Dividing by the incident flux gives, cleanly,
The -dependence cancels — as it must, since the cross-section is a property of the target, not of how far away we put the detector. (One subtlety: the incident and scattered waves interfere, but only in the exact forward direction ; off-axis the cross term is negligible, which is why the clean result holds for the detector placed at finite angle.)
The optical theorem
Probability is conserved, and that forces a relation between forward scattering and the total cross-section. Demanding that no probability accumulates at the target — the net outward flux of vanishes — yields the optical theorem:
where is the amplitude in the forward direction . Physically, the beam is depleted because particles scatter out of it; that depletion is an interference effect between the incident wave and the forward-scattered wave, so it must be tied to .
A useful special case: isotropic s-wave
When only the lowest angular-momentum component contributes (the next lessons make this precise), is independent of angle: , controlled by a single phase shift . Then is constant, and the total cross-section is just times it,
You can verify this respects the optical theorem: , so exactly — unlike the Born approximation, the partial-wave amplitude is unitary by construction.
Try it
Take pure s-wave scattering at with phase shift . Compute the total cross-section with .
Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.