|q⟩ Bad Qubits

advanced · Physics · Topological Order & Anyons

Abelian Anyons

The simplest anyons act on the quantum state by multiplying it by a phase. Because phases commute, these are called abelian anyons. The toric code realizes the canonical example, and analyzing it shows how braiding produces a topologically invariant phase — a discrete analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm effect.

Two species in the toric code

The toric code has two basic nontrivial excitations: electric charges ee (violations of the vertex/star stabilizers Av=ivXiA_v=\prod_{i\in v} X_i) and magnetic fluxes mm (violations of the plaquette stabilizers Bp=ipZiB_p=\prod_{i\in p} Z_i). Each is created in pairs at the ends of an error string: an ee pair at the ends of a ZZ-string, an mm pair at the ends of an XX-string. Both ee and mm are their own antiparticles (e×e=1e \times e = 1, m×m=1m \times m = 1), and each individually behaves as a boson.

Mutual statistics: the 1-1 of braiding

The interesting statistics are mutual: between an ee and an mm. Move an mm flux on a closed loop that encircles a single ee charge. The ee excitation is created by a ZZ-string and the mm-transport is an XX-string; the loop crosses the ee's string an odd number of times, and the anticommutation XZ=ZXX Z = -Z X at the single crossing site contributes

ψ(braid)ψ=ψψ.\langle \psi | \,(\text{braid})\, | \psi \rangle = -\,\langle \psi | \psi \rangle.

So carrying an mm all the way around an ee multiplies the state by 1-1:

ψ    ψ.|\psi\rangle \;\longmapsto\; -|\psi\rangle.

The bound state ε=e×m\varepsilon = e \times m inherits these crossings and turns out to be a fermion: a self-exchange of two ε\varepsilon's gives a 1-1. The toric code thus hosts a Z2×Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2 fusion structure with four superselection sectors {1,e,m,ε}\{1, e, m, \varepsilon\}, often called a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 gauge theory or D(Z2)D(\mathbb{Z}_2) anyon model.

A topological Aharonov–Bohm phase

The full braid (one particle taken once around the other) gives the mutual statistics phase eiθeme^{i\theta_{em}} with θem=π\theta_{em}=\pi for the toric code. The decisive feature is that this phase depends only on the winding number — how many times the loop encircled the other anyon — and not on the loop's size or shape. It is the topological analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm phase a charge picks up encircling a flux tube: only the enclosed flux matters, not the trajectory. Here the "charge" and "flux" are emergent quasiparticles of the medium, and the enclosed "flux" is quantized to give exactly 1-1.

Why a single state, not a degenerate space

Because every braid is a phase, a configuration of abelian anyons at fixed positions has a unique state up to that phase. There is no protected degenerate space among the quasiparticles themselves. Storage of quantum information instead uses the global ground-state degeneracy on a nontrivial surface (the 4g4^g states on a genus-gg surface) — this is the logical space of the surface/toric code. Abelian braiding alone is therefore not enough for universal computation, motivating the non-abelian anyons of the next lessons.

What to take away

Abelian anyons braid by multiplying the state by a phase that depends only on winding number. The toric code's ee and mm are each bosons but braid with mutual statistics 1-1: carrying one fully around the other gives a phase of 1-1, a topological Aharonov–Bohm effect enforced by XZ=ZXXZ=-ZX. Information is stored not in the anyons but in the global ground-state degeneracy of the surface.

Sign in on the full site to ask questions and join the discussion.